@nano_banana_ibotFreemium
These Telegram bots use AI to edit photos automatically — removing backgrounds, upscaling low-resolution images, restoring old or blurry photos, and retouching portraits, all without installing an editor.
| # | Bot | Price | Languages | Inline | Groups | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @nano_banana_ibot | Freemium | EN · RU | no | no | 74 |
| 2 | @AI_Background_Remover_Bot | Free | EN | no | no | 71 |
| 3 | @BgKillerBot | Freemium | EN · RU | no | no | 64 |
| 4 | @removebg_bot | Freemium | EN · RU | no | no | 64 |
| 5 | @PerfectMyFace_bot | Freemium | RU | no | no | 63 |
| 6 | @restore_photo_bot | Freemium | RU | no | no | 56 |
We ran the same 4 photos through every bot: a portrait for background removal, a small low-resolution photo under 500 px wide for upscaling, an old scanned photo with scratches for restoration, and a photo taken in low light for general enhancement. We compared edge accuracy on background removal, checked upscaled detail at 2x and 4x, and noted the free daily limit and whether a watermark was added.
Test with the hardest case for the task you actually need, not the easiest one: for background removal that's fine hair or fur against a busy backdrop, not a studio headshot on white; for upscaling that's a photo already under 500 px wide, since small models struggle to invent detail that was never captured. A bot that handles the easy case well can still fail badly on the one you'll actually use it for.
Upscaling adds plausible detail rather than recovering real information, so text, faces in the background, and fine patterns often come out slightly wrong even when the overall image looks sharper. Background removal struggles most with semi-transparent edges — glass, hair strands, motion blur — where the cutout leaves a visible halo or eats into the subject; check the edge at full zoom before trusting the result for anything public-facing.
Free tiers usually cap you by number of photos per day, commonly 3–10, rather than by resolution, but the output itself may be compressed or watermarked until you pay. Compare the exported file size against the original — a result that's smaller than the source despite being labeled "enhanced" has likely been re-compressed, which quietly undoes part of the improvement.
Yes — most bots offer a free daily limit for background removal, usually a few photos a day, though a full-resolution result is often reserved for the paid tier.
Upscaling sharpens the image and adds plausible detail, but it can't recover information that wasn't in the original — very small or heavily blurred photos can end up looking slightly artificial.
It depends on the bot — check its privacy policy; some delete files right after processing, others keep them for a while to improve their model.
