@QuizBotFree
These Telegram bots turn studying into questions: quizzes you write or generate for yourself, a class or a group, and flashcards that come back on a spaced-repetition schedule until the answer sticks.
| # | Bot | Price | Languages | Inline | Groups | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @QuizBot | Free | EN | yes | yes | 91 |
| 2 | @memo_card_bot | Freemium | EN · RU · UK · ES · MULTI | no | no | 85 |
| 3 | @perebot | Free | RU · MULTI | no | no | 71 |
| 4 | @quizzy_chatbot | Freemium · Free starter coins; playing, editing and broadcasting existing quizzes cost nothing | EN · RU · DE · ES · MULTI | no | yes | 69 |
| 5 | @nihongo_go_bot | Freemium | EN | no | no | 69 |
| 6 | @microstudyai_bot | Freemium | EN | no | no | 66 |
| 7 | @pupilbot_bot | Freemium · One study (up to 50 pages) from photos, a PDF or text | EN · ES · DE | no | no | 65 |
We did not test these bots by hand; the list rests on what can be checked in the open. For each bot we confirmed on its t.me page that it is a live bot, found the developer's site, repository or channel that links to it, and took prices, free limits, interface languages and the date of the latest commit or post from those sources. For this subtopic we also noted who writes the questions (you, an AI or a ready-made catalogue), whether reviews follow a spaced-repetition schedule, and whether quizzes run in groups and decks can be shared or exported. A bot whose owner we could not trace was taken off the list.
Quiz Bot is Telegram's own builder, and you type every question: mark the correct option, add a picture or an explanation shown after the answer, set a timer. The finished quiz gets a link, starts inline in any group and ends with a leaderboard, and there is no limit on how many you make. Quizzy AI skips the typing: send a topic, pick 5 to 30 questions and a difficulty, and it writes the options and an explanation for each answer, then you take the quiz alone, run it in a group lobby with a scoreboard or post it to your channel on a schedule. Generation spends coins once the free starter balance is gone, and an AI answer key needs checking before it reaches a class, which is what its manual editor is for.
The method is old and boring and it works: a card you answered correctly comes back later, a card you missed comes back sooner, and the interval grows each time you get it right. A bot is a good host for it because the review arrives as a notification instead of waiting behind an app icon - five minutes a day beats an hour on Sunday. MemoCard is built around this schedule, Nihongo Go applies it to Japanese vocabulary and kanji from N5 to N1, and Microstudy AI and PupilBot write the questions from your own notes and send each one when it is due.
Three things. Can a deck be shared, because a study group or a teacher will want to pass one around. Is there a catalogue of ready-made decks, because typing a hundred cards is where most people quit. And can you get your cards out - an export, a web version, or an open-source project you could self-host. A year of review history is worth more than the app it lives in, so prefer a bot that does not lock it up. MemoCard covers all three: decks travel by Telegram link, the catalogue is built in, and the code is open under MIT, with browser and mobile apps; Microstudy AI exports its cards as an Anki deck.
It is better at getting you to actually review, because the reminder lands in the messenger you already read. An app is better for heavy editing of big decks.
Yes, in MemoCard: a deck is shared with a Telegram link, so nobody exports or imports a file. For a quiz rather than cards, Quiz Bot gives every quiz a link and can start it inline in the class group, with a leaderboard at the end.
With a deck of a few hundred cards, a few minutes - the schedule only brings back what is due, which is the point of the method.
