Comparison · For students
InLaTeXbot vs PlagiarismSearch.com
For writing formulas in a study-group chat, InLaTeXbot (@InLaTeXbot) is the pick; PlagiarismSearch.com (@Plagiarismsearchbot) does a different job, so choose by task. InLaTeXbot is free and open source: type the bot's name and your LaTeX in any chat and send the rendered image, or send longer code to the bot for a vector PDF. Inline queries stop at about 250 characters, and you need to know LaTeX. PlagiarismSearch.com is the official bot of a checker running since 2009: paste text or send a document and get a similarity report as a PDF, with five free checks of up to 1,000 words before paid packages. If you are about to submit an essay or a thesis chapter, choose PlagiarismSearch.com.
@InLaTeXbot
FreeInline mode
80/ 100
#1 in For studentsType @inlatexbot and a LaTeX formula in any chat, watch the preview redraw as you type, and send it as an image. Longer code sent to the bot directly comes back as an image and a vector PDF.
@Plagiarismsearchbot
FreemiumOfficial
74/ 100
The official bot of PlagiarismSearch.com: paste text or send a document and get a similarity report as a PDF and a link. A way to catch a missing quotation mark before your university's check does.
By the numbers
InLaTeXbot is ahead: 80 against 74 out of 100 for PlagiarismSearch.com. InLaTeXbot wins on price & free tier, safety & privacy, localization, no intrusive ads. PlagiarismSearch.com wins on reliability & speed, usability, freshness. InLaTeXbot: Free. PlagiarismSearch.com: Freemium · 5 free submissions of up to 1,000 words each for bot users, per the service.
At a glance
| InLaTeXbot | PlagiarismSearch.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and limits | Free | Freemium · 5 free submissions of up to 1,000 words each for bot users, per the service |
| Languages | EN | — |
| Inline mode | yes | no |
| Mini App | no | no |
| Works in groups | no | no |
| Works in channels | no | no |
| Accepts voice | no | no |
| Accepts files | no | yes |
| Requires phone number | no | no |
| Requires registration | no | no |
| Shows ads | no | no |
| Official | no | yes |
| Developer | Gleb Fedorov | PlagiarismSearch.com |
| Last check | October 22, 2026 | October 22, 2026 |
Score by criterion
| Criterion | Weight | InLaTeXbot | PlagiarismSearch.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functionality | 25 | 8 | 8 |
| Reliability & speed | 15 | 7 | 8 |
| Popularity & trust | 15 | 7 | 7 |
| Price & free tier | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| Usability | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Safety & privacy | 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Freshness | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Localization | 5 | 10 | 6 |
| No intrusive ads | 5 | 10 | 9 |
| Total | 100 | 80 | 74 |
Pros and cons
InLaTeXbot
- Live preview while you type
- Works in any chat without adding the bot
- Vector PDF for slides and papers
- Free and open source
- Inline queries are limited to about 250 characters
- You need to know LaTeX syntax
- A one-person project that has gone offline before
PlagiarismSearch.com
- Official bot of a checker running since 2009
- A PDF report you can keep and show
- Free submissions to try it out
- The service says checked papers are not added to its database
- Paid once the free submissions are used up
- Your text is uploaded to a third-party service
- The score will not match your university's system exactly
Frequently asked questions
InLaTeXbot or PlagiarismSearch.com: which is better?
InLaTeXbot is ahead: 80 against 74 out of 100 for PlagiarismSearch.com. InLaTeXbot wins on price & free tier, safety & privacy, localization, no intrusive ads. PlagiarismSearch.com wins on reliability & speed, usability, freshness. InLaTeXbot: Free. PlagiarismSearch.com: Freemium · 5 free submissions of up to 1,000 words each for bot users, per the service.
Are InLaTeXbot and PlagiarismSearch.com free?
InLaTeXbot: Free. PlagiarismSearch.com: Freemium · 5 free submissions of up to 1,000 words each for bot users, per the service.
Do InLaTeXbot and PlagiarismSearch.com work in groups?
InLaTeXbot: no. PlagiarismSearch.com: no.