Comparison · Image generation
Kandinsky vs GPT4Telegram
If all you need is pictures, Kandinsky (@kandinsky21_bot) is the better choice: the official bot of the Kandinsky image model is completely free, takes prompts in English or Russian, mixes the styles of two images and extends a picture beyond its original frame. GPT4Telegram (@GPT4Telegrambot) is a general AI hub with about 2.3 million monthly users: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek in one chat, voice messages, web search and Midjourney-class image models — but it is freemium and does not disclose its free daily allowance. Pick GPT4Telegram when images are only part of the job and you also want to ask questions, draft texts or search the web in the same chat.
@kandinsky21_bot
FreeOfficial
83/ 100
#1 in Image generationSber's official image-generation bot: describe a picture in Russian or English and Kandinsky draws it, mixes styles, and outpaints beyond the original frame — all for free.
@GPT4Telegrambot
Freemium
76/ 100
An all-in-one AI hub inside Telegram: chat with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek, generate images with Midjourney-class models, and search the web — all from one bot with millions of monthly users.
By the numbers
Kandinsky is ahead: 83 against 76 out of 100 for GPT4Telegram. Kandinsky wins on reliability & speed, price & free tier, usability, safety & privacy, freshness, no intrusive ads. GPT4Telegram wins on popularity & trust. Kandinsky: Free. GPT4Telegram: Freemium.
At a glance
| Kandinsky | GPT4Telegram | |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly users | 32.6K | 2.3M |
| Pricing and limits | Free | Freemium |
| Languages | EN · RU | EN · RU · MULTI |
| Inline mode | no | no |
| Mini App | no | no |
| Works in groups | no | no |
| Works in channels | no | no |
| Accepts voice | no | yes |
| Accepts files | no | no |
| Requires phone number | no | no |
| Requires registration | no | no |
| Shows ads | no | no |
| Official | yes | no |
| Developer | Sber AI | — |
| Last check | November 4, 2026 | November 4, 2026 |
Score by criterion
| Criterion | Weight | Kandinsky | GPT4Telegram |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functionality | 25 | 8 | 8 |
| Reliability & speed | 15 | 9 | 7 |
| Popularity & trust | 15 | 7 | 10 |
| Price & free tier | 10 | 10 | 6 |
| Usability | 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Safety & privacy | 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Freshness | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Localization | 5 | 10 | 10 |
| No intrusive ads | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Total | 100 | 83 | 76 |
Pros and cons
Kandinsky
- Official model from a large, stable company
- Completely free
- Photorealism can lag behind the newest frontier models on some prompts
- Exact daily generation limits aren't published
GPT4Telegram
- Several frontier models in a single chat
- No separate app for each model
- Accepts text, voice and image prompts
- Free daily allowance is not disclosed on the bot's profile
- Being an aggregator, quality depends on the model you pick
Frequently asked questions
Kandinsky or GPT4Telegram: which is better?
Kandinsky is ahead: 83 against 76 out of 100 for GPT4Telegram. Kandinsky wins on reliability & speed, price & free tier, usability, safety & privacy, freshness, no intrusive ads. GPT4Telegram wins on popularity & trust. Kandinsky: Free. GPT4Telegram: Freemium.
Are Kandinsky and GPT4Telegram free?
Kandinsky: Free. GPT4Telegram: Freemium.
Do Kandinsky and GPT4Telegram work in groups?
Kandinsky: no. GPT4Telegram: no.