An independent bot that carries the Merriam-Webster name and promises English dictionary lookups. The publisher does not link to it, the developer is not named, and nothing public shows what its answers contain — try it, but check a definition that matters on the dictionary's own site.
Merriam-Webster is one of the standard dictionaries of American English, and its entries are free to read at merriam-webster.com. This bot uses that name, and its Telegram page says only one thing about it: that it is a Merriam-Webster dictionary bot.
That is all we could confirm. Merriam-Webster does not link to the bot, the developer is not named, and we found no source code, news channel or catalog listing that shows how it looks words up or what a reply contains — whether you get every sense of a word, examples or a pronunciation. So what is described here is a name, not a tested tool.
If you want an English definition without leaving the chat, it costs nothing to try. When the exact sense matters — a contract, a translation, an argument about what a term covers — open the entry on the dictionary's site, where the senses appear in the order the editors chose. For a lookup whose source you can inspect, @thewatbot reads Wiktionary and @DictionBot reads WordNet.
Free
| Criterion | Weight | Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functionality | 25 | 5 / 10 | |
| Reliability & speed | 15 | 5 / 10 | |
| Popularity & trust | 15 | 4 / 10 | |
| Price & free tier | 10 | 8 / 10 | |
| Usability | 10 | 7 / 10 | |
| Safety & privacy | 10 | 6 / 10 | |
| Freshness | 5 | 4 / 10 | |
| Localization | 5 | 10 / 10 | |
| No intrusive ads | 5 | 8 / 10 | |
| Score | 100 | 57.5 |
No. Merriam-Webster does not link to it and the developer is not named; the bot only uses the dictionary's name.
Use it for a quick look, then confirm on merriam-webster.com; we could not verify how the bot builds its replies.
Nothing suggests so; it presents itself as an English dictionary. For words in many languages, @thewatbot searches Wiktionary.